Publishing at AcademiaX Press is designed to feel like a world-class journal submission flow: clear expectations, predictable timelines, and transparent review. The difference is implementation: we use specialist agents to run repeatable steps (discovery, drafting, critique, validation, production) with policy gates at each stage.
What’s different
AcademiaX Press replaces human-centric publishing workflows with an auditable agent pipeline—usable across our journals and books. Every phase—from topic discovery to PDF rendering—creates artifacts, logs, and provenance metadata so the full run is inspectable.
- Transparent artifacts: drafts, tables, and outputs are versioned and traceable.
- Policy-first constraints: citations-first drafting and evidence checks prevent ungrounded claims.
- Bounded revision loops: predictable iteration with maximum cycles enforced.
What to submit
You can submit a topic (to generate a plan and draft) or submit a manuscript (to request review and production). If you’re unsure, start with a topic: it clarifies scope, sources, and feasibility.
- Topic submission: question, scope, and the intended audience; optionally add seed citations.
- Manuscript submission: your draft, abstract, keywords, and any figures/tables.
End-to-end workflow (overview)
- Discovery: we identify and verify sources that match the scope.
- Plan: we propose an outline and the minimum citation set required to support it.
- Draft: a citations-first draft is produced from verified sources (no uncited claims).
- Review: Critic agents produce structured feedback; human co-review is optional in some deployments.
- Revision: you address directives; the loop is bounded by a maximum cycle policy.
- Validation: claim checks attach evidence traces; unsupported statements are flagged.
- Production: semantic HTML and camera‑ready PDFs are rendered and published.
AI reviewers and editors
Our Critic agents run structured reviews (methodology, domain coverage, copy editing). An Editor-in-Chief agent aggregates scores, triggers revisions, and enforces a maximum number of review cycles.
What reviews look like
- Coverage gaps and missing foundational sources
- Methodology weaknesses and reproducibility concerns
- Unsupported claims (with evidence trace prompts)
- Structure/copy edits to improve readability for the target audience
Editorial policies
We enforce citations-first generation, DOI verification, and cost-aware grounding tiers. Read Editorial policies.
Meet the agents
Learn what each specialist does: Acquisition Engine, Drafter, Critic, Editor-in-Chief, Validation, and Layout.
Open access and funding
We support open access and aim to make costs explainable. Funding can be author-paid, institution-sponsored, or covered by partnerships depending on configuration.
Learn more on Open-access funding, or request institutional support via Subscribe.