Language editing is not just grammar. For scholarly writing, it’s about making claims testable, methods readable, and structure predictable—so reviewers can evaluate the work and readers can trust it. Our editing workflow is designed to produce auditable change logs and consistent outcomes at scale.
What we provide
- Academic tone and structure normalization
- Terminology consistency and glossary support
- Figure and table captions aligned to the narrative
- Change logs suitable for peer review
What we do not do
We do not invent results, fabricate citations, or add unsupported claims. Language editing improves clarity, not truth. If an argument is unclear because evidence is missing, the workflow will flag the gap rather than “smooth it over”.
How the workflow works
- Intake: you provide the manuscript or topic, target audience, and any required style guide.
- Normalization: structure and tone are normalized (headings, abstract, methods, results).
- Consistency: terminology is harmonized; acronyms and definitions are aligned.
- Captions: tables/figures get captions that match the narrative and cite sources where needed.
- Change log: edits are reported as a structured log suitable for review and iteration.
Suggested packages (example)
- Basic: copy-editing, grammar, clarity, and consistent terminology.
- Advanced: structural re-organization, section rewriting, and stronger signposting for arguments.
- Premium: advanced editing + submission support (cover letter template, highlights, and compliance checklist).
Next step
Submit a topic now and we’ll expand to manuscript uploads in the next iteration. Submit manuscript to AI.